AW: AW: Outlook for European NPP by Strategic Forecasting, Inc.

[Franz Schönhofer <franz.schoenhofer@chello.at>]

Stewart,



I personally have done it already - it is now 7 pm in Vienna and I was

busy to answer a few of the many reactions on private e-mail. Most were

positive, many originating in the USA, a few were negative, but

constructive and not insulting and therefore worth to be discussed -

using the persons e-mail address. I really do not intend to discuss

Ricks comment on RADSAFE! 



It is so easy to send comments to me personally, just press the "answer"

button instead the "answer all" one!



Best regards,



Franz



Franz Schoenhofer

PhD, MR iR

Habicherg. 31/7

A-1160 Vienna

AUSTRIA

phone -43-0699-1168-1319





> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

> Von: Stewart Smith [mailto:sssmith@scientech.com]

> Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Jänner 2005 18:25

> An: 'Strickert, Rick'; 'Franz Schönhofer'; garyi@trinityphysics.com;

> radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Betreff: RE: AW: Outlook for European NPP by Strategic Forecasting,

Inc.

> 

> Can't we take this soon to be endless debate to each person's e-mail

> address

> and not on RADSAFE?

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> [mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Strickert,

Rick

> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:11 AM

> To: Franz Schönhofer; garyi@trinityphysics.com;

> radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Subject: RE: AW: Outlook for European NPP by Strategic Forecasting,

Inc.

> 

> > It is my sincere opinion - and I have written it many times on

RADSAFE

> > - that radiation protection is not a matter of science, but of

> > politics.

> 

> Franz,

> 

> Your sincerity and whether radiation protection, especially the

> regulations,

> involve politics, are not why your earlier email is objectionable.

> 

> What is objectionable is (in my sincere opinion) your delusional

leftist

> nonsense that the US "illegally" attacked another country, and the

> specious

> connection to nuclear power used to post such nonsense on the RADSAFE

> list.

> 

> The military actions taken by the U.S. against another country (Iraq)

were

> done legally under U.S. Public Law 107-243 (October 20, 2002; House

Joint

> Resolution 107-114; http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf),

and

> the War Powers Resolution of 1973 (Public Law 93-542).

> 

> Under the War Powers Resolution, the U.S. Congress has not exercised

its

> authority to order the President to withdraw military forces from

Iraq.

> To

> the contrary, Congress has continued funding support for the U.S.

military

> forces.  And until a federal court (including probably the U.S.

Supreme

> Court) says otherwise both Public Laws are constitutional and the U.S.

> military action is legal.

> 

> Rick Strickert

> Austin, TX







************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/