[ RadSafe ] ANSI Standards for Portals, Meters and Dosimetry.
Tom Hazlett
tomhaz at aol.com
Fri Apr 1 23:02:23 CEST 2005
Actually, Pete Chiaro and Laticia Pibida at NIST are running the show
for the ANSI standards.
Currently there are standards for portals, identifiers and personal
dosimeters.
ANSI N42.32: Performance Criteria for Alarming Personal Radiation
Detectors for Homeland Security
This standard describes design and performance criteria along with
testing methods for evaluating the performance of instruments for
homeland security that are pocket sized and carried on the body for the
purpose of detecting the presence and magnitude of radiation. This
standard specifies the performance criteria for radiation detection and
measurement instruments that may be used in a variety of environmental
conditions. The performance criteria contained in this standard are
meant to provide a means for verifying the capability of these
instruments to reliably detect significant changes above background
levels of radiation and alert the user to these changes.
ANSI N42.33: Radiation Detection Instrumentation for Homeland Security
This standard establishes design and performance criteria, test and
calibration requirements, and operating instruction requirements for
portable radiation detection instruments. These instruments are used
for detection and measurement of photon emitting radioactive substances
for the purposes of detection and interdiction and hazard assessment.
The informative annexes of this standard provide reference information.
ANSI N42.34: Performance Criteria for Hand-Held Instruments for the
Detection and Identification of Radionuclides
This standard addresses instruments that can be used for homeland
security applications to detect and identify radionuclides, for gamma
dose rate measurement, and for indication of neutron radiation. This
standard specifies general requirements and test procedures, radiation
response requirements, and electrical, mechanical, and environmental
requirements. Successful completion of the tests described in this
standard should not be construed as an ability to successfully identify
all isotopes in all environments.
ANSI N42.35: Evaluation and Performance of Radiation Detection Portal
Monitors for Use in Homeland Security
This standard provides the testing and evaluation criteria for Radiation
Detection Portal Monitors to detect radioactive materials that could be
used for nuclear weapons or radiological dispersal devices (RDDs).
Portal monitors may be used in permanent installations, in temporary
installations for short-duration detection needs, or as a transportable
system. These systems are used to provide monitoring of people, packages
and vehicles to detect illicit radioactive material transportation, or
for emergency response to an event that releases radioactive material.
...ODP issued a requirement that emergency responders could not purchase
Portals, Survey Meters, and Dosimetry with ODP money unless the equipment
met New ANSI Standards....
Any devices that is tested will be placed on the DHS list regardless of
its performance. Devices simply have to be tested. DHS is to take the
test data and format it in a "Consumer Report" type table. that table
should be available soon after the second round of testing..
There are problems with some of the standards as written that are too
much to go into here. That said, I think that for a first cut the
standard and testing went ok for N42.34 the standard for radionuclide
identifiers. I expect that a revision of some of the standards will be
considered after the testing is completed and any shortcommings are
uncovered.
Contact Pete Chiaro at NIST for additional input.
Tom Hazlett
XRF Corp.
sandyfl at earthlink.net wrote:
>Hi Tony,
>
>Yes, there is some contradictory policies in play here.
>
>The ANSI N42 Committee is not under the HPS Secretariat, and as such,
>is not within my direct involvement in my capacity as Chair, HPS
>Standard Committee.
>
>Here is the ANSI N42 website, that may shed some light:
>
>http://standards.ieee.org/getN42/
>
>For additional information, I suggest contacting Morgan Cox for
>answers to some of your questions, since Morgan is significantly
>involved with these Standards morgancx at swcp.com
>and also Mike Unterweger, NIST, also significantly involved
>michael.unterweger at nist.gov
>
>Good luck on finding rationale behind the scenes!
>-------------------------------------
>Sandy Perle
>Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
>Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
>2652 McGaw Avenue
>Irvine, CA 92614
>
>Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
>Fax:(949) 296-1902
>
>E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
>E-Mail: sandyfl at earthlink.net
>
>Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
>Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
>
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
>radsafe at radlab.nl
>
>For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit:
>http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
>
>
More information about the radsafe
mailing list