[ RadSafe ] Re: DU

[bobcherry at cox.net]

Doug,

It is nice to hear from you. Please don't write to me again.

I do not want to debate you. I will not debate you. I do not want to talk to you. I also have a full-time job and recreational activities, so I don't have any time to spend on you personally.

I make no attacks on you, personal or otherwise. If you review the record, I have addressed what I see in the responsible media and pointed out errors. This is what I did below. You ignored my corrections, here and elsewhere. This is why I continue to put them out. Get and keep the media record straight and I will keep quiet.

Finally, it is not required for me to provide "legal justification" for the military use of DU because 1) I have no legal training, and 2) as the accuser, you have the responsibility of proving your assertion.

Bob

> 
> From: Dlind49 at aol.com
> Date: 2005/04/07 Thu PM 08:35:58 EDT
> To: bobcherry at cox.net,  pao at centcom.mil
> CC: John.Skinner at osd.mil
> Subject: DU
> 
> Ok Bob enough of your nonsense. This is not personal but you continue to make 
> it personal You have led an attack against me for years because of my efforts 
> to ensure that depleted uranium contamination was cleaned up and medical care 
> was / is provide to all DU casulties as required by U.S. Army Regulation 
> 700-48 and U.S. Army Technical Bulletin 9-1300-278  and that medical care is 
> provide to all casualties as required by numerous orders.   It is time to stop the 
> nonsense and answer the question directly!  Will you or will not not endorse 
> full compliance with AR 700-48, TB 9-1300-278, and all of the orders mandating 
> medical care for all DU casualties?   And one more rtequest please provide 
> thorough legal justifcation for the use of uranium munitions. 
> 
> 
> thank you, 
> doug rokke