[ RadSafe ] Re: DU
Flanigan, Floyd
Floyd.Flanigan at nmcco.com
Fri Apr 8 18:49:40 CEST 2005
Gentlemen,
I am getting the impression that this is not a suitable forum for these exchanges. Please, if you two must continue this, do so elsewhere.
Floyd W.Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
Behalf Of bobcherry at cox.net
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:31 AM
To: Dlind49 at aol.com; pao at centcom.mil; radsafe at radlab.nl
Cc: John.Skinner at osd.mil
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: DU
Doug,
It is nice to hear from you. Please don't write to me again.
I do not want to debate you. I will not debate you. I do not want to talk to you. I also have a full-time job and recreational activities, so I don't have any time to spend on you personally.
I make no attacks on you, personal or otherwise. If you review the record, I have addressed what I see in the responsible media and pointed out errors. This is what I did below. You ignored my corrections, here and elsewhere. This is why I continue to put them out. Get and keep the media record straight and I will keep quiet.
Finally, it is not required for me to provide "legal justification" for the military use of DU because 1) I have no legal training, and 2) as the accuser, you have the responsibility of proving your assertion.
Bob
>
> From: Dlind49 at aol.com
> Date: 2005/04/07 Thu PM 08:35:58 EDT
> To: bobcherry at cox.net, pao at centcom.mil
> CC: John.Skinner at osd.mil
> Subject: DU
>
> Ok Bob enough of your nonsense. This is not personal but you continue to make
> it personal You have led an attack against me for years because of my efforts
> to ensure that depleted uranium contamination was cleaned up and medical care
> was / is provide to all DU casulties as required by U.S. Army Regulation
> 700-48 and U.S. Army Technical Bulletin 9-1300-278 and that medical care is
> provide to all casualties as required by numerous orders. It is time to stop the
> nonsense and answer the question directly! Will you or will not not endorse
> full compliance with AR 700-48, TB 9-1300-278, and all of the orders mandating
> medical care for all DU casualties? And one more rtequest please provide
> thorough legal justifcation for the use of uranium munitions.
>
>
> thank you,
> doug rokke
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl
For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
More information about the radsafe
mailing list