AW: [ RadSafe ] Bob Cherry on pyrophoric uranium munitions
Kent, Michael D.
Michael.Kent at nmcco.com
Wed Apr 13 13:08:26 CEST 2005
UO2 + 2 NO + 2 O2 --> UO2(NO3)2
UO2 + 2 NO2 + O2 --> UO2(NO3)2
2 UO3 + 4 NO + 2 O2 --> 2 UO2(NO3)2
So Mr. Salsman,
Is your concern with uranium intake in the population?
If it is I suggest you go after the power plants which burn coal first. The population as a whole receives a heck of a lot more uranium from these gems, then lets say, depleted uranium shells used in a specific theater half a world away.
Or, is your objections just to anything nuclear? In which again I ask why not go after the coal burning power plants? They release more unmonitored radioactivity in a year than a comparable sized nuclear plant. The coal burning plant also release mercury, which will affect your daughters baby a lot quicker than the minute amount of uranium being deposit somewhere around the world. And their is a lot of medical research that DEFINITIVELY proves this!
Michael D. Kent
The opinions present here are my own. And BTW I am on a break.
More information about the radsafe
mailing list