[ RadSafe ] uranium birth defect causation details

[Maury Siskel]

Well, I am pointing out that so also are most political decisions 
peer-reviewed. Peer-review is highly desireable, but it is no gaurantee 
of either quality politics or science. Examples abound.
Cheers,
Maury&Dog   (Maury Siskel   maurysis at ev1.net)
__________
An ounce of fear and passion is worth a ton of fact and logic. Jerry Cohen

============================
James Salsman wrote:

> Well, I should point out that Dr. Schott's study appeared in the
> scientific peer-reviewed medical literature --
>   http://rpd.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/3/211
> -- while the Royal Society report did not.
>
> Also, the chair of the Royal Society working group on depleted 
> uranium,  Professor Brian Spratt, has made a number of comments 
> subsequent to the publication of their report expressing a great deal 
> more concern than  the conclusions of the report might imply.
>
> Sincerely,
> James Salsman
>
> Maury Siskel wrote:
> --------------------- snipped -------------