[ RadSafe ] radsafe rules

[hayden_mercer at bellsouth.net]

I find that Sandy's posts contain, for the most part, interesting 
information that is on topic for this list.  If I don't want to read some of 
the articles then I don't.  I do not find that his inclusion of articles 
referencing his employer to be offensive and as has been said before, he 
provides a valuable service.  Sandy's track record has been outstanding. 
Sandy is a responsible member - let him post as he see's fit  --- 'nuf said.

Hayden Mercer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan at nmcco.com>
To: "Wilson Robert H PSNS" <wilsonr at psns.navy.mil>; "Baumbaugh, Joel SPAWAR" 
<joel.baumbaugh at navy.mil>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Cc: "John R Laferriere" <john.laferriere at bms.com>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] radsafe rules


Once and for all ... Sandy has been posting responsibly for God knows how 
long. I have yet to find anything he has posted without some value 
regardless of context. As far as I'm concerned, let him post at will. If you 
can't trust his content or intent implicitly, you can't trust anyone.

Floyd W.Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
Behalf Of Wilson Robert H PSNS
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:51 AM
To: 'Baumbaugh, Joel SPAWAR'; radsafe at radlab.nl
Cc: John R Laferriere
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] radsafe rules


It certainly doesn't bother me, and I believe Sandy's contributions far
outway the need to spend any time on this!

-----Original Message-----
From: Baumbaugh, Joel SPAWAR [mailto:joel.baumbaugh at navy.mil]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:28 AM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Cc: John R Laferriere
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] radsafe rules


My own personal opinion is that Sandy's News-articles/wires which contain
references to his company are pretty "benign"...  I don't read everything he
sends out as the information sub-titles are sufficient to decide what's of
interest, but I enjoy having the choice to read or not to read them.  It may
bother others but it doesn't bother me....

Just my 2-cents...

Joel Baumbaugh (joel.baumbaugh at navy.mil)
SSC-SD...

....std. disclaimer about this being my own opinion, not necessarily that of
the U.S. Navy, etc.



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
Of Sandy Perle
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:20 AM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Cc: John R Laferriere
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] radsafe rules


On 7 Feb 2005 at 7:15, John R Laferriere wrote:

> Hello, Marcel- Welcome and thank you for taking over the list!  Sandy
> just asked whether there were any rules changes for radsafe.  There is
> one thing that Sandy posts that I feel is inappropriate.  When he
> posts news articles, he sometimes includes PR Newswire releases about
> his own company*.


I don't see this as an issue, since what I posted is in the news,
and, is information.

I'll go with whatever the list memebers want, and particularly the
rule that Marcel states.

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl

For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl

For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl

For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe