AW: [ RadSafe ] did everyone get this email?

Wed Feb 9 17:53:07 CET 2005

Hi, Don,

Thank you for your calming posting. I'll stick to what I wrote to the
list - I'll not answer anything in the future like the Mitchell Davis
posting. I do not regret my original posting to "Caspar", because his
request was totally unacceptable and showing that he had not the
slightest idea of what he was actually asking for. (A secret code? Will
we have CIA and DHS checking RADSAFE soon? Or is it already under
control?) 

Franz Schoenhofer
PhD, MR iR
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
AUSTRIA
phone -43-0699-1168-1319

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im
> Auftrag von Mercado, Don
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 09. Februar 2005 17:24
> An: bengeks at connix.com; radsafe at radlab.nl
> Betreff: RE: [ RadSafe ] did everyone get this email?
> 
> People ("gentlemen" does NOT apply in this case) cool your jets.
> 
> While I agree with aspects of Mr. Davis' assessment of Franz's post in
> this instance, his post doesn't belong on Radsafe. It should have been
> sent by private email. The same could be said for Franz' original
reply to
> Casper's post and his reaction to MD's post. All are rude, childish
and
> unprofessional. Ms. Benge, I apologize on behalf of them, and hope you
> won't judge the rest of us by the actions of a few.
> 
> Please keep your posts to Radsafe sane, professional and radiation
> related. Others are watching us and I hate going into the field and
having
> to try to explain this type of post to people whom I'm trying to gain
> their respect.
> 
> Thank you Michael for moderating Radsafe and than you Marcel for
taking
> over. You've taken on a task as difficult as herding cats and managing
a
> preschool daycare center at the same time.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
> Behalf Of Sandra Benge, Recruiter, 203-925-1500
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:34 AM
> To: radsafe at radlab.nl
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] did everyone get this email?
> 
> 
> I was surprised to receive this email from the group.  Professional
> disagreement is one thing, but this is just plain rudeness and
nastiness.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
> Behalf Of Franz Schönhofer
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:13 AM
> To: 'Mitchell Davis'; 'Sun, Lin-Shen'; 'Stabin, Michael'; 'radsafe'
> Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] RE: SOMETHING ABOUT NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND
THE
> WASTE
> 
> 
> Mr Davis Mitchell,
> 
> First I laughed on your ridiculous comment, while still laughing I
would
> recommend you to again block my e-mail address or at least not answer
to
> my comments, or if you cannot avoid it, to answer to me privately,
because
> it might be very negative for your business and I will do whatever I
can
> to teach you how to behave. I have already taken action. While the
> discussion has been at RADSAFE about two or three postings of Sandy
about
> his company you have according to what I have saved until now used
RADSAFE
> only to advertise your "courses on NORM".
> 
> You must have been very drunk or intoxicated by other chemicals, that
you
> have not even been able to write my name correctly. From my postings
you
> should know better about my expertise. I am not providing you with my
CV,
> unless you offer me a very well paid job.
> 
> Your other comments are funny and I will provide them to my friends,
just
> for illustration how ridiculous some people who claim to be in the
> Radiation Protection Community might be.
> 
> Franz
> 
> 
> Franz Schoenhofer
> PhD, MR iR
> Habicherg. 31/7
> A-1160 Vienna
> AUSTRIA
> phone -43-0699-1168-1319
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im
> > Auftrag von Mitchell Davis
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 09. Februar 2005 08:15
> > An: Franz Schönhofer; 'Sun, Lin-Shen'; 'Stabin, Michael'; 'radsafe'
> > Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] RE: SOMETHING ABOUT NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND
> THE
> > WASTE
> >
> > Dear Mr. Smokesahofer:
> >
> > I have been reading your always ridiculous postings for close to 10
> yrs
> > now.
> > You never cease to amaze me.  Who do you think you are?  The most
> eminent
> > health physicist that has ever lived?  You,Sir, are by your own
> admission
> > a
> > water chemist...a water boy!!!...Do you think only reactor HP's
> frequent
> > this site?  You should know that is not true as you have probably
> never
> > set
> > foot in an operating reactor plant.  At one time, I had actually
> blocked
> > you...then some how...you returned...like a bad penny.  I don't know
> what
> > your are smoking...except what your name implies, but you need to
get
> a
> > grip...a BIG GRIP.  Stop your constant belittlement of those you
> purport
> > know less than you (and who most undoubtedly know a great deal more
> than
> > you).  Your reply to Mr. Sun was completely uncalled for.  You would
> pale
> > in
> > comparison to a pimple on the butt of a mediocre HP in the US.
Where
> did
> > you get that PhD.?...Crackouch U?...Mary Jane State?...Buttplug
> > Polytech?...I'd run your butt ragged in a US power plant just
showing
> you
> > where the friskers are.  Have you ever provided HP coverage for a
> spent
> > fuel
> > movement?...a S/G jump....a RCP Seal replacement?...a CVC filter
> > replacement?...Diving operations?....Spent Fuel Pool
Rerack?...Thought
> > so...NOT!!!!...Well there are a lot of professionals (unlike your
> pathetic
> > self) on here who I realize have done a lot of things I have never
> done,
> > but
> > that does not make them less professional or less important to the
HP
> > profession.  So pick up a meter (if you even know which end to
> grab)...get
> > your butt in the cavity...and do some real HP work you pathetic
piece
> of
> > ....I'll leave that for poetic license!!!!!
> >
> > Mitchell W. Davis, RRPT
> > Health Physicist
> > Radiation Protection Consultants
> > 432-697-3523
> > 432-349-4824 (Cell)
> > radiation at cox.net
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Franz Schönhofer" <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
> > To: "'Sun, Lin-Shen'" <casper at bnl.gov>; "'Stabin, Michael'"
> > <michael.g.stabin at vanderbilt.edu>; "'radsafe'" <radsafe at radlab.nl>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:17 PM
> > Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] RE: SOMETHING ABOUT NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND
> THE
> > WASTE
> >
> >
> > Caspar, Lin-Shen Sun or whatever your name is,
> >
> > Your request is unbelievable. You really are a BNL employee? I
> recommend
> > you to learn for quite a few years about nuclear physics, about
> reactor
> > physics and radiation protection. What is a typical spent fuel core?
> > What core, what reactor design what...,. what....., what.,..,.  Your
> > posting is so absurd that I would believe that the CIA should
contact
> > you! (I am serious.)
> >
> > Franz Schoenhofer
> > PhD, MR iR
> > Habicherg. 31/7
> > A-1160 Vienna
> > AUSTRIA
> > phone -43-0699-1168-1319
> >
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]
Im
> > > Auftrag von Sun, Lin-Shen
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. Februar 2005 22:15
> > > An: 'Stabin, Michael'; radsafe
> > > Betreff: [ RadSafe ] RE: SOMETHING ABOUT NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND
THE
> > WASTE
> > >
> > > Happy Chinese New Year!
> > >
> > > I'm looking for radiation dose rate or risk or sort of hazard
index
> > about
> > > nuclear fuel or reactor core as a comparison study before and
after
> > been
> > > irradiated (i.e., used) in a reactor.  Moreover, I wish to know
for
> a
> > > typical spent fuel core, how many years is required to cool off,
> when
> > the
> > > radiation hazard is no worst then its beginning (i.e., before
loaded
> > into
> > > the reactor conditions).
> > >
> > > I hope this is clear so you can guide me to all useful references.
> > >
> > > Thanking you in advance,
> > > Casper
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> > > radsafe at radlab.nl
> > >
> > > For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
> > visit:
> > > http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> > radsafe at radlab.nl
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> > http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> > radsafe at radlab.nl
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
> visit:
> > http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl
> 
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
visit:
> http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl
> 
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
visit:
> http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> radsafe at radlab.nl
> 
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
visit:
> http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe