[ RadSafe ] SPECT/CT survey

[Jaro]

That's very interesting John.
Somehow, I was under the impression that there were many more PET machines
in service, than SPECT --- reason being that PETs don't need nuke reactors
for support, and as we all know, the latter are rapidly going out of style
(or out of "political correctness").
Would you please explain, if possible, why your establishment's nuke
medicine dep't seems to be bucking the trend ? ....or is the appearance of
such a trend simply fictitious ?

Thanks again.

 Jaro

 Jaro Franta, P.Eng.
Tel.: (514) 875-3444
Montréal, Québec
frantaj at aecl.ca
web master, CNS Québec branch:
http://www.cns-snc.ca/branches/quebec/quebec.html

<><><><><><><><><><><>



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On Behalf
Of John Jacobus
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 12:21 PM
To: molex77 at yahoo.com; radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] SPECT/CT survey


We currently have a single PET/CT scanner, and four
SPECT cameras.  All of our SPECT images are fused to
separate CT scanners.
<SNIP>

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005