[ RadSafe ] Re: radsafe Digest, Vol 5, Issue 5

[Keith Welch]

Is the TFP "study" actually published somewhere?  I suppose it's on 
their website, but did they actually publish in a peer-reviewed journal, 
or elsewhere? 

Keith Welch
welch at jlab.org

>On 17 Feb 2005 at 0:12, Richard L. Hess wrote:
>
>  
>
>>So I know the TFP is considered bad science here, but how do they come
>>up with this increase and if this was leaking out wouldn't the NGS's
>>detectors go into alarm?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, bad science. They come up with the increase using imagination 
>and fantasy. Yes, effluent monitors would detect the release.
>
>I surmise that they would see the same levels in baby teeth from 
>araes where there isn't a nuclear plant for hundreds of miles. That 
>would be a good control group. The excuse the TFP gives when asked to 
>look at a control group is that they don't have the funds. Simplistic 
>excuse, yet they have no problem scaring fmailies with their non-
>scientific rubbish. How many $$$ can you put on that?
>