[ RadSafe ] Re: Understanding negligible dose

[dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com]

Excellant point.  Just like the anti-Fedearlists.  It has turned out that
they were mostly correct and the Federalists have turned out to have been
way ower optimistic.  But the anti-Federalists picked a less than optimum
name.

Don Kosloff



                                                                                                                                       
                      "Brodsky, Allen"                                                                                                 
                      <ALLEN.BRODSKY at sa        To:       jjcohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net>, dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com                  
                      ic.com>                  cc:       Albrodsky at aol.com, "Brodsky, Allen" <ALLEN.BRODSKY at saic.com>,                 
                                                radsafe at radlab.nl, radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl, sandyfl at earthlink.net,                   
                      02/23/2005 04:17          vargo at physicist.net                                                                    
                      PM                       Subject:  RE: [ RadSafe ] Re: Understanding negligible dose                             
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       




By the way, I testified that the term "Below Regulatory Concern" was not
the
best way to go.  They should have said "Levels Above Which Regulatory
Requirements are Needed."  This way, you do not say you are "not concerned"
about anything. One shows an infinitesimal concern in looking at the level
and deciding there is no risk. But I was ignored as usual.  Allen




-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal
and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately,
and delete the original message.