[ RadSafe ] Review faults Sandia risk assessments
Sandy Perle
sandyfl at earthlink.net
Sun Feb 27 18:53:01 CET 2005
Index:
Review faults Sandia risk assessments
NASA awards UT Southwestern $9.8 million grant to study radiation
GE Gets Taiwan Nuclear Plant Contract
Quake Had More Impact on Wash. Nuke Plant
PG&E Still Thinks Missing Nuclear Fuel At Humboldt Plant
Report: Lab didn't follow procedures for departing employees
Richardson wants feds to protect lab benefits and pensions
===============================================
Review faults Sandia risk assessments
ALBUQUERQUE (AP) - Sandia National Laboratories has not adequately
assessed risks to the public from an accident involving one of its
reactors, a federal report concludes.
The National Nuclear Security Administration's report, dated Dec. 10,
was released Friday by the Washington, D.C.-based Project on
Government Oversight, known as POGO.
The evaluation "noted no unsafe operations during the course of the
review," but found deficiencies in safety procedures and documents.
"The problem is that if there is indeed an accident, they have a
serious problem" because the lab underestimated possible radiation
doses or how far and fast a hazardous plume could travel, Pete
Stockton, a senior investigator for POGO, said by telephone.
"So the issue is one of safety analysis. In case of an accident, what
is the impact, and you have to protect public health and safety,"
Stockton said.
John German, head of media relations for Sandia, said the lab has
been aware of the concerns for months and that "corrective actions
are being completed now."
"The draft report that POGO has publicized is further evidence that
the oversight process is working as it should," he said. "The NNSA
independent review was part of the routine oversight the NNSA
provides for the lab's reactor facilities, and the lab welcomes and
values its input and recommendations."
The report found no immediate threat to lab workers or the public,
German said.
The December assessment of safety analyses found deficiencies in the
lab's evaluation for Sandia's pulsed reactor facility - specifically,
the team found it "not credible" that people at a nearby golf course
or stables could be evacuated in time to avoid plumes of hazardous
material that might be released.
"Thus, the best that can be achieved is the mitigation of any doses
that the public may receive from an accident," the report said.
It also faulted Sandia for "incomplete consideration" of the impact
of accidents on workers in the area and its analysis of types of
accidents and how to handle them.
The team also found shortcomings in the analysis for Sandia's annular
core research reactor, saying the radiation dose from an accident
there could be significant.
It also said that in some cases, both natural and manmade hazards
weren't properly identified and assessed, and that the lab failed to
justify why it didn't evaluate certain hazards.
The team said the Sandia site office appears capable of correcting
most of the issues. However, among other things the report
recommended updating the office's review and approval procedures and
developing screening standards to evaluate the adequacy of safety
documents.
The report also criticized a corrective action plan Sandia developed
to address issues raised in a letter last September from the Defense
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The team said the plan lacked
timetables and details.
------------------
NASA awards UT Southwestern $9.8 million grant to study radiation
DALLAS (AP) - Researchers at the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center were awarded a $9.8 million, five-year NASA grant to
study radiation's effects on astronauts and how to reduce the
possible health risks caused by space travel.
UT Southwestern, which announced its involvement Thursday, and the
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at Harvard Medical School were selected
by a peer review for the grant from the 11 applications submitted.
The money will establish the NASA Specialized Center of Research for
the Estimation of Solid Tumor Cancer Risks from Space Radiation.
"The implications of radiation in space on the human body are not
well understood, and this grant will enable us to examine the
consequences and risks," said Dr. Jerry Shay, a professor of cell
biology who worked on UT's application for the grant.
Part of the new center's work will focus on eliminating cancer cells
in patients and increasing the understanding of radiation's effects.
"From this research we also expect to learn much that will help us in
prevention and treatment of cancer here on Earth. We look forward to
working closely with NASA in this endeavor," said Dr. John Minna, who
will become director of the new NASA center at UT Southwestern.
UT Southwestern previously received a $5 million, five-year NASA
grant in 1993. It helped establish a physiology center to study the
mechanisms that allow living organisms to adjust to changing demands
from their environment.
Similar NASA specialized centers have been set up at Colorado State
University, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and Loma Linda University.
----------------
GE Gets Taiwan Nuclear Plant Contract
NEW YORK (AP) - General Electric Co. said Wednesday that it received
a multimillion-dollar contract to upgrade monitoring and control
systems at a Taiwanese nuclear power plant.
GE did not provide the exact value of the contract in a news release.
The deal, awarded to GE Energy's nuclear business, includes the
design, engineering and training associated with installing a digital
measurement analysis and control technology at the 1,272-megawatt
Chin Shan plant on the northern tip of the island. The company said
it will also customize the hardware and software for the plant.
GE Energy is also working on other projects in Taiwan, including two
boiling water reactors at the Lungmen nuclear power station in
northeastern Taiwan.
----------------
Quake Had More Impact on Wash. Nuke Plant
YAKIMA, Wash. (AP) - The impact of a severe earthquake on a
radioactive waste treatment plant under construction at the Hanford
nuclear reservation is almost 40 percent greater than previously
estimated, according to a new study.
The nearly $6 billion plant - the federal government's largest
construction project - is being built to treat millions of gallons of
highly radioactive waste left from Cold War-era nuclear weapons
production.
Construction is already about 35 percent complete at the south-
central Washington site. Work has been slowed or shifted to other
parts of the plant while engineers re-evaluate its design.
The U.S. Department of Energy, which manages the site cleanup, and
the contractor hired to build the plant stressed the chances of a
severe earthquake at the site are slim.
In addition, some construction work that already has been re-
evaluated - the concrete walls at the plant, for instance - meet the
new seismic requirements and will not have to be changed.
"Earthquakes, No. 1, don't happen a lot in this area, and if they do
happen, we are building a very robust plant to handle it," Roy
Schepens, manager of the Energy Department's Office of River
Protection, said Thursday.
In 2002, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board raised concerns
that the Energy Department had failed to adequately investigate the
impact a severe earthquake might have on the plant.
The agency had gathered seismic data from the entire 586-square-mile
Hanford reservation to determine the impact, but did not conduct a
seismic investigation of the plant site itself.
The agency conducted a more thorough evaluation in 2004; the data
were sent to a federal science laboratory for review.
The results of that review - released first to The Associated Press
this week - found the force of the ground movements at the plant site
during a worst-case-scenario earthquake would be 38 percent greater
than previously estimated.
Engineers now are working to apply that new number to the plant's
design; the process could take four to six months, Schepens said.
"In the near term, we will develop very conservative design criteria
that will allow us to advance the design and construction
activities," he said.
Whether the new data will affect the cost and schedule of the work
has not yet been determined, Schepens said.
For 40 years, the Hanford reservation made plutonium for the nation's
nuclear weapons arsenal. Today, work there centers on a $50 billion
to $60 billion cleanup, to be finished by 2035.
About 1,700 people have been working to build the plant, which will
stand 12 stories tall and be about the size of four football fields.
----------------
PG&E Still Thinks Missing Nuclear Fuel At Humboldt Plant
SAN FRANCISCO (Dow Jones)--Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PCG) continues
to believe that three missing nuclear fuel rod segments are either in
a storage facility at its long-shuttered Humboldt Bay power plant or
at an offsite nuclear waste facility.
But in a press release Wednesday, PG&E also said as a result of its
seven- month investigation into the whereabouts of the missing 18-
inch rod segments, it also concluded there is a small amount of
additional non-fuel radioactive material the company can't locate.
The additional missing material was part of plant instrumentation and
amounts to less than 0.006 of an ounce, which is "most probably" at a
low-level nuclear waste facility, the utility holding company said.
In an interim report to the Nuclear Regulatory Agency, PG&E said its
efforts to locate the missing fuel rod segments suggest they were in
the spent fuel pool all along, but were broken into smaller pieces at
some point during their storage.
PG&E has found fragments in the pool, which is 26-to-30 feet deep and
measures 22-by-28 feet. But "unfortunately, their condition after 40
years of being stored under other components in the pool makes
positive identification extremely difficult," Greg Rueger, senior
vice president for generation and chief nuclear officer said in a
statement.
"The results of the investigation to date, while inconclusive,
support our original belief that the segments are either in our
possession in the used fuel pool or were shipped offsite to a
licensed nuclear waste facility," Rueger said.
The company began an investigation in June when it discovered
conflicting records indicating either that the fuel rod segments were
stored in the used fuel pool in 1968 or were shipped to a licensed
nuclear waste facility in 1969.
PG&E also said barriers in place at the plant were sufficient to
detect and prevent attempted theft of the fuel rod segments, which it
added are of insufficient quality and quantity to construct an
effective so-called dirty bomb or a nuclear weapon.
PG&E expects to submit a final report on the investigation in the
second quarter of 2005.
The Humboldt plant, near Eureka, Calif., was closed in 1976 and is
slated for decommissioning, with spent fuel moved to dry cask
storage.
----------------
Report: Lab didn't follow procedures for departing employees
ALBUQUERQUE (AP) - Employees who quit their jobs at Los Alamos
National Laboratory regularly failed to turn in security badges and
complete other measures to ensure they no longer had access to
classified information or nuclear material, according to a report.
The inspector general of the U.S. Department of Energy, which
oversees the northern New Mexico nuclear weapons lab, began
investigating last year after concerns that disks and other lab
property containing secret information might have been going home
with departing employees.
The investigation found that the lab did not follow correct
termination procedures for more than 40 percent of 305 former
employees sampled.
The report released Friday stated that lab policies at the time
didn't ensure that former employees "had their security clearances
and access authorizations to classified matter and/or special nuclear
material terminated in a timely matter."
Neglected steps in dismissals and retirements included security
briefings and accounting for lab property.
While the investigation was going on, the lab was already reviewing
its personnel policies, lab spokesman James Rickman said Friday.
"Essentially, the laboratory was aware of weaknesses in its
outprocessing procedures in early 2003," he said.
Last December, the lab changed the way people leave their jobs, which
Rickman said has resulted in nearly complete compliance with security
policies.
The new policies, such as making termination procedures the
responsibility of a manager rather than the employee, have not been
around long enough to evaluate, the report said.
Before the changes, employees leaving the lab were responsible for
duties like turning in badges and making sure they no longer had
security clearance.
Ten percent of the 1,668 employees who left between Jan. 1, 2002, and
Feb. 25, 2004, didn't turn in their badges, according to the report.
Forty-four of those had badges that allowed access to secret
information and nuclear material, and some of the badges allowed
access to other DOE sites, the report said.
Both Rickman and the report noted that no nuclear material, lab
equipment or sensitive information has gone unaccounted for because
of retired employees.
Los Alamos has suffered a series of management failures and security
lapses. Most recently, fears surrounding two missing computer disks
containing sensitive information resulted in a virtual shutdown of
the lab last July. An investigation revealed the disks never existed.
------------------
Richardson wants feds to protect lab benefits and pensions
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) - Gov. Bill Richardson has voiced concerns about
changes made by federal officials to a draft request for proposals
regarding contract competition for Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Richardson, a former congressman and energy secretary, maintains that
benefits and pensions of workers at one of the nation's premier
nuclear weapons laboratories is a critical issue for lab employees
and the rest of New Mexico.
"The men and women of Los Alamos national lab have made a great
contribution to our nation's security at home and abroad. This
competition should in no way harm them," Richardson said in a
statement issued Friday.
The contract to manage Los Alamos is up for bid for the first time in
the lab's 60-year-plus history.
Los Alamos has been managed by the University of California since the
lab's inception as a top-secret World War II project to develop the
atomic bomb. However, the Energy Department decided to put the
contract up for bid after a series of management failures and
security problems.
The impact of a potential switch in lab managers on employee benefits
has been a source of concern within the lab and among state leaders
and the congressional delegation.
The National Nuclear Security Administration's Source Evaluation
Board announced changes to the request for proposals - some dealing
with pension and retirement issues - in a document released last
week.
The evaluation board ensured that the winner of the contract would
have to provide a total compensation package for all employees that
is "substantially equivalent" to the benefits and pensions provided
by the current contract with the University of California.
Workers would be able to transfer their accrued service credit and
leave balances with the new lab manager, according to the board.
Richardson said the pension plan offered by UC is a key part of the
university's ability to attract and retain top scientists and other
employees.
"This competition is about ensuring what is best for the nation and
the laboratory, not just about ensuring competition for competition's
sake," he said.
The board will accept comments from potential bidders through March
4. The government plans to select a contractor this summer to begin
work Oct. 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
More information about the radsafe
mailing list