[ RadSafe ] NAS "impartiality"

[jjcohen at prodigy.net]

The only explanation I have seen, is that they found the evidence
"unconvincing". If they gave any more cogent explanation, I missed it.
Perhaps you can let us know what it is.
Jerry




----- Original Message -----
From: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
To: <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] NAS "impartiality"


> I think they indicated why they rejected the hormesis
> studies.  If you do not accept their reasoning, maybe
> you have a preconceived conclusion and cannot accept
> their conclusions.