[ RadSafe ] DNA Damage and Oxydative Processes

John Jacobus crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 9 05:25:46 CEST 2005


Interesting. So those who promote hormesis have been
manipulating the data.  Do you have any proof of this?

--- jjcohen at prodigy.net wrote:

> Franz,
>     As I said, by torturing (manipulating, playing
> with, or whatever term
> you prefer),
> "one could reach any desired conclusion" (pro or
> con!)
> That is why the selection of panel members  can
> control the decisions that
> are made --- and is why the USA and French expert
> panels on low-dose
> radiation effects, looking at essentially the same
> data could come to
> opposite conclusions.
> Much as I dislike doing so, I must agree with the
> French on this one.
> Vive la ---- whatever.  Have a nice weekend,     
> Jerry
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Franz Schönhofer"
> <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
> To: <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; <Rainer.Facius at dlr.de>;
> <goldinem at songs.sce.com>;
> <radsafe at radlab.nl>
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:00 PM
> Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] DNA Damage and Oxydative
> Processes
> 
> 
> Jerry,
> 
> Sine ira et studio: Isn't your remark of
> "sufficiently torturing any data
> set" applicable to those defending the opposite?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Franz
> . . .

+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the radsafe mailing list