[ RadSafe ] DNA Damage and Oxydative Processes
John Jacobus
crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 9 05:25:46 CEST 2005
Interesting. So those who promote hormesis have been
manipulating the data. Do you have any proof of this?
--- jjcohen at prodigy.net wrote:
> Franz,
> As I said, by torturing (manipulating, playing
> with, or whatever term
> you prefer),
> "one could reach any desired conclusion" (pro or
> con!)
> That is why the selection of panel members can
> control the decisions that
> are made --- and is why the USA and French expert
> panels on low-dose
> radiation effects, looking at essentially the same
> data could come to
> opposite conclusions.
> Much as I dislike doing so, I must agree with the
> French on this one.
> Vive la ---- whatever. Have a nice weekend,
> Jerry
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Franz Schönhofer"
> <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
> To: <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; <Rainer.Facius at dlr.de>;
> <goldinem at songs.sce.com>;
> <radsafe at radlab.nl>
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:00 PM
> Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] DNA Damage and Oxydative
> Processes
>
>
> Jerry,
>
> Sine ira et studio: Isn't your remark of
> "sufficiently torturing any data
> set" applicable to those defending the opposite?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Franz
> . . .
+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the radsafe
mailing list