[ RadSafe ] Re: AW: Making policies

[jjcohen at prodigy.net]

As we are all aware, government policies have been based on the assumption
that 2+2=5.
However, there is a disagreeable bunch of so-called "scientists" out there
who keep insisting that the preponderance of evidence indicates that
actually 2+2=4. Accordingly, the NAA (National Academy of Arithmetic) has
formed an expert panel to review and assess the relevant data.
To avoid  possible bias, only those who have traditionally supported
existing policies are included on the panel and those with a contrary
"political agenda"  are excluded . And that, children, is how science should
be done. Right?


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
To: "Muckerheide, James" <jimm at WPI.EDU>; <Rainer.Facius at dlr.de>;
<jjcohen at prodigy.net>; <goldinem at songs.sce.com>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 8:49 PM
Subject: RE: AW: [ RadSafe ] DNA Damage and Oxydative Processes


> Jim,
> I certainly agree that all of the data needs to be
> looked at, but I think those have a political agenda
> should not be doing it. I assume you would agree that
> those who are against the LNT might not be the best
> judges of BEIR VII.
> --- "Muckerheide, James" <jimm at WPI.EDU> wrote:
> > John,
> >
> > It seems Rainer's info is pretty plain.  BEIR VII
> > misrepresents this data.
> > Their misrepresentation supports a false claim, or
> > at least implies, that
> > this evidence supports the LNT.
> >
> > The right questi
>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++
> "Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never
shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
>
> -- John
> John Jacobus, MS
> Certified Health Physicist
> e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - no fees. Bid on great items.
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/