[ RadSafe ] Fire Insurance AND NukAlert AND Flu Vaccine

John Jacobus crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 16 16:03:11 CEST 2005


Actually, the need for a NukeAlert is vanishingly
small.  How may radiogical releases have occurred
off-site in the last 20 years that would elicited a
response to your NukeAlert?  Conversely, how many
house fires have occurred in your city in the last
year?  How many heart attacks occur in your city each
year?

--- howard long <hflong at pacbell.net> wrote:

> Likelyhood of need for a NukAlert is now in about
> the same order of magnitude as your house burning
> down. If you have fire insurance and smoke
> detectors, it would be similarly prudent for HPs,
> "firemen" looked to in any such unlikely
> catastrophe, to prepare.
>  
>  Have you used the CPR you learned? Does that mean
> you wasted your time or money?
>  
> Likewise, NucAlert (or similar detection - I have no
> stock in it)
>  
> Howard Long
> 
> John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am not sure what your letter-to-the-editor on
> intradermal vaccinations or fire insurance has to do
> with the discussion. My comments refer to the fact
> that our concerns are misdirected. We are spending
> significant resources on detection are preparedness
> for radiological weapons. Yet, natural biological
> agents, like viruses have kill more individuals. 
> Rather than running around with radiation meters
> attached to our wrists, we need to reassess the real
> dangers to our societies.
> 
> --- howard long wrote:
> 
> > John, I, too, am concerned about avian flu
> > (attached)
> > 
> > Do you have fire insurance on your home?
> > That event is also highly unlikely and more cost
> to
> > insure than NukAlert.
> > 
> > Howard Long
> > 
> > John Jacobus wrote:
> > Currently, I more concerned about an out break of
> > avian flu. Our health care system is certainly not
> > capable of handling such a natural event.
> > 
> > --- howard long wrote:
> > 
> > > Karl, Chuck and HPs,
> > > Jane M Orient MD, Pres, Physicians for Civil
> > > Defense, (prev. college physics teacher)
> > > notifies June 10, 2005, "If our government fails
> > to
> > > prevent the No-Longer-Unthinkable event,
> > > DHS equipment - and policy - will keep rescue
> > teams
> > > miles away from the area!"
> > > 
> > > "Local officials will have no way to distinguish
> > > lethal from negligible doses of radiation, or to
> > > determine the adequacy of shelter. Millions
> could
> > > die an agonizing death from PREVENTABLE 
> > > radiation sickness - unless you help." 
> > > 
> > > "Put radiation monitoring in the hands of EVERY
> > > citizen"."We have the technology: Nukalert" - 
> > > 
> > > The one on my key chain has imprinted: 
> > > # chirps 1 - 41 days to get 100rad, 2- 20d,
> 3-10d,
> > > 4-5d, 6-1d, 7-15hr, 8-8hr, 9-4hr, 10+ <2hr
> > > Neat! get one! www.NukAlert.com 
> > > 


+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 


More information about the radsafe mailing list