[ RadSafe ] Residential Lung Cancer Study

[Fritz A. Seiler]

Hi All,

I am just working in this area with Joe Alvarez, so I have a 
simple question:
Where are these analyses that show a clear-cut dose-response 
relationship even below the EPA action levels? Or to put it 
more bluntly:

We hear you, so WHERE IS THE BEEF?

Best regards,

Fritz


*****************************************************
Fritz A. Seiler, Ph.D.
Sigma Five Consulting:          Private:
P.O. Box 1709                   P.O. Box 437
Los Lunas, NM 87031             Tomé, NM 87060
Tel.:      505-866-5193         Tel. 505-866-6976
Fax:       505-866-5197         USA
*****************************************************

*****************************************************
"This is the hour when democracy must justify
itself by capacity  for effective decision, or risk
destruction or disintegration. Europe is dotted
with the ruins of right decisions taken too late."

"America's Responsibility in the Current Crisis"
Manifesto of the Christian Realists. May, 1940.
*******************************************************




-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of niton at mchsi.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:30 AM
To: Otto G. Raabe
Cc: RadSafe
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Residential Lung Cancer Study


There is a clear statistically significant dose-response relationship
(even 
below the EPA's action level) as better measures of retrospective radon
gas 
estimates are used. Even the analyses using data from homes that
included 
measurements of radon reflecting a limited percent of the exposure
period nealy 
produced a statistically significant dose response.