[ RadSafe ] Residential Lung Cancer Study

[howard long]

Was the data gathered selectively? Otto's observation is not consistent with many other studies, including the massive data of B. Cohen.
 
Howard Long MD MPH(e[idemiology) 


niton at mchsi.com wrote:
There is a clear statistically significant dose-response relationship (even 
below the EPA's action level) as better measures of retrospective radon gas 
estimates are used. Even the analyses using data from homes that included 
measurements of radon reflecting a limited percent of the exposure period nealy 
produced a statistically significant dose response.


> At 11:43 AM 3/4/2005, Tom Mohaupt wrote:
> >I've finally gotten a copy of the Residential Radon and Risk of Lung 
> >Cancer article form Epidemiology (Vol. 16, no. 2, March 2005, page. 137.
> *********************************************************
> March 7, 2005
> 
> I looked at the paper on line, and there does not seem to be any 
> statistically significant dose-response relationship as a function of radon 
> concentration.
> 
> Otto
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
> Center for Health & the Environment
> (Street Address: Bldg. 3792, Old Davis Road)
> University of California, Davis, CA 95616
> E-Mail: ograabe at ucdavis.edu
> Phone: (530) 752-7754 FAX: (530) 758-6140
> *********************************************** 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> radsafe at radlab.nl
> 
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
> http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl

For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe