[ RadSafe ] N. American Residential Lung Cancer Study

Rogers Brent Brent.Rogers at environment.nsw.gov.au
Wed Mar 9 00:20:54 CET 2005


Dr Field

I don't see a Table 5 in this paper.

Brent Rogers
Manager Radiation Operations Unit
NSW Environment Protection Authority
Department of Environment and Conservation
?+61 2 9995 5986
?+61 2 9995 6603
??PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232?

-----Original Message-----
From: niton at mchsi.com [mailto:niton at mchsi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2005 9:56 AM
To: Fritz A. Seiler
Cc: 'RadSafe'
Subject: [ RadSafe ] N. American Residential Lung Cancer Study


Dr. Seiler,

The information you requested is in Table 5.  It clearly shows a
statistically
sigificant excess odds ratio at 100 Bq/m3 for homes monitored over 10 years.

As pointed out in the paper, "Field et al. have recently demonstrated that
empiric models with improved retrospective radon exposure estimates were
more
likely to detect an association between prolonged residential radon
exposure and lung cancer."  

http://www.aarst.org/news_pdf/2002_IowaU_Follow-up_Study.pdf


Further, "Odds ratios exhibit no apparent evidence of nonlinearity
throughout the range of radon concentrations observed
in these studies."

If you or Dr. ALvarez have any concerns about the analysis or its
inperpretation, we would welcome a letter-to-the-editor regarding your
concerns. 

Regards, Bill

R. William Field, M.S, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
College of Public Health
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health
University of Iowa
Iowa City, IA 52242

319-335-4413
bill-field at uiowa.edu


> Hi All,
>
> I am just working in this area with Joe Alvarez, so I have a
> simple question:
> Where are these analyses that show a clear-cut dose-response
> relationship even below the EPA action levels? Or to put it
> more bluntly:
>
> We hear you, so WHERE IS THE BEEF?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Fritz
>
>
> *****************************************************
> Fritz A. Seiler, Ph.D.
> Sigma Five Consulting:          Private:
> P.O. Box 1709                   P.O. Box 437
> Los Lunas, NM 87031             Tomé, NM 87060
> Tel.:      505-866-5193         Tel. 505-866-6976
> Fax:       505-866-5197         USA
> *****************************************************
>
> *****************************************************
> "This is the hour when democracy must justify
> itself by capacity  for effective decision, or risk
> destruction or disintegration. Europe is dotted
> with the ruins of right decisions taken too late."
>
> "America's Responsibility in the Current Crisis"
> Manifesto of the Christian Realists. May, 1940.
> *******************************************************
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
> Behalf Of niton at mchsi.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:30 AM
> To: Otto G. Raabe
> Cc: RadSafe
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Residential Lung Cancer Study
>
>
> There is a clear statistically significant dose-response relationship
> (even
> below the EPA's action level) as better measures of retrospective radon
> gas
> estimates are used. Even the analyses using data from homes that
> included
> measurements of radon reflecting a limited percent of the exposure
> period nealy
> produced a statistically significant dose response.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl

For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe


This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. Any views
expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the
sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) which now incorporates the
NSW Environment Protection Authority. The Department accepts no liability
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email and recommends
that the recipient check this email and any attachments for viruses.


More information about the radsafe mailing list