[ RadSafe ] Re: Bomb - Breast Ca with-9 rad LESS than for unexposed

[John Jacobus]

You are looking at the wrong paper. Now, answer my
question about the 1977 paper, if you can. --- howard
long <hflong at pacbell.net> wrote:
> John, your archaic, simplistic, unnatural assumption
> of LNT perpetuates bureaucratic sloth. It must not
> infect impressionable newcomers, so , I'll answer
> again.
>  
> Table 2 left column, in showing only "0-1, 0-9,
> 0-50, 0-100, etc" (approx, I don't have it here at
> home), suggests Land and McGregor's assumption that
> a little radiation was bad. Numerous studi

+++++++++++++++++++
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy
enough people to make it worth the effort." Herm Albright

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/