[ RadSafe ] RE : Nuclear plants not on top of list : Rad riskbooklet

[Flanigan, Floyd]

That issue can also become part of the body of work.

Floyd W. Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
Behalf Of Pete_Bailey at fpl.com
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:20 AM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: [ RadSafe ] RE : Nuclear plants not on top of list : Rad
riskbooklet


<snip>

Jose,
The issue of psychological impact of such an event definitely needs to be
addressed. Being both an author and a degreed radiation protection
professional, perhaps I should write an informational book which would
explain in layman's terms the reality of radiation and it's associated
effects according to the true data at hand . . .

</snip>

<opinion>

Spend your time writing a layman's booklet as to why a nuke plant
would not suffer reactor threatening damage from 'outside' attack
( Planes, Choppers, Bazookas...)

Although you may convince the layman that low levels of exposure are
basically harmless, they need to 'feel' that a plant under attack
WILL NOT be a source of High Level Exposure.

</opinion>

     Pete


_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
radsafe at radlab.nl

For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe