[ RadSafe ] Re: Hormesis - Necessary for Public Protection

[howard long]

Summary not supported by the data, as by Kyota staff, is not evidence, but opinion.
 
Whatever other data is presented in the other paper cannot erase the fact that fewer breast cancer cases occurred at 1-9 rad exposure than predicted using formula that found more than expected with exposure over 50 rad. To what other data do you refer, John? 
 
Howard
 
John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> wrote:
What does the Kyota Treaty have to do with this
discussion? If you do not understand the thread
please say so.

You certainly do not perpetuate unwarranted
conclusions, but why can you not answer the questions
asked, e.g., the data in the McGregor and Land 1977
report? 

However, you did make a claim that I said that I
propose use of the LNT for emergency response to
terrorism. Did you also make this up?

--- howard long wrote:

> How come the Kyota staff summary was disclaimed by
> many of the contributing scientists?
> 
> Look at data. I do not perpetuate unwarranted
> conclusions. That answers John's question.
> 
> Come to the DDP meeting in Las Vegas July 16-18 to
> debate this more. Our Jan '05 Newsletter includes,
> "A DHS proposal to dramatically reduce the
> requirements for cleaning up radioactive
> contamination from a dirty bomb or nuclear explosive
> would greatly diminish economic losses."
> www.oism.org/ddp