[ RadSafe ] Re: OSHA Federal Register Notice
George J. Vargo
vargo at physicist.net
Thu May 5 18:33:50 CEST 2005
Wes,
I do know that NY has an agreement that NYSDOL enforces OSHA. As for other
states, I don't know, but your point is well taken. There needs to be a
regulatory framework in place in the event that there would be no
corresponding state regulation.
George J. Vargo, Ph.D., CHP
Senior Scientist
MJW Corporation
http://www.mjwcorp.com <http://www.mjwcorp.com/>
610-925-3377
610-925-5545 (fax)
vargo at physicist.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Wesley [mailto:wesvanpelt at att.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:58
To: vargo at physicist.net; BLHamrick at aol.com; radsafe at radlab.nl;
clayton.bradt at labor.state.ny.us
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Re: OSHA Federal Register Notice
George and All,
I believe "state regulated activities" such as accelerator produced
radioactive material, x-ray machines, accelerators, etc. actually do come
under OSHA. Since OSHA is federal and includes ionizing radiation, and there
is no "agreement state" agreement with the states, OSHA overrules the
states. On a practical basis, however, OSHA seems perfectly agreeable to
have the states enforce their own patchwork of regulation of ionizing
sources.
Best regards,
Wes
Wesley R. Van Pelt, PhD, CIH, CHP
Wesley R. Van Pelt Associates, Inc.
More information about the radsafe
mailing list