[ RadSafe ] Overcoming America's nuclear power phobia
John Jacobus
crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Wed May 11 17:29:28 CEST 2005
Do you think that a utility would not build any plant
because of anti-nuclear protest? If the protesters
are so powerful, why is the government encouraging
industry to build nuclear power plants? Then Bush's
promotion is a waste of time and money, don't you
agree? I suggest you write your representatives to
not waste your tax money in promoting nuclear power.
So the utilites spends twice as much money building a
plant. They will recoup their losses. Have any lost
money on an operating nuclear power plant?
--- John Grant <grantjoh at pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
> John Jacobus wrote:
>
> >To me, the real test is what happens with a company
> >proposes to build a new nuclear power plant in the
> >U.S. The hypothesis that radiophobia is the
> problem
> >to the development of new power plants is
> speculative.
> > I think that this is an economic issue, which can
> be
> >fixed by giving tax incentives to the power
> companies.
> >
> The radiophobic antis can cause serious delays in
> construction. This
> becomes an economic issue.
>
> John Grant
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++
"Embarrassed, obscure and feeble sentences are generally, if not always, the result of embarrassed, obscure and feeble thought."
Hugh Blair, 1783
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
More information about the radsafe
mailing list