[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Incinerator effluents
- To: radsafe
- Subject: Incinerator effluents
- From: mandel (Hector Mandel)
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 93 09:22:41 -0600
Patrick, my guess is that you really do not have a dilemma. The
average annual concentration at the point of release is not a
function of flow rate in the incinerator stack. You are probably
basing your calcualtions on the concentration at the point of release
only during periods when the incinerator is in operation. To
calculate the average annual concentration, you also need to average
in the concentraion during the times that the incinerator is NOT
operating. After all, the hypothetical individual who has his head
stuck in your stack is there ALL YEAR :) . All you have to show the
NRC is that the ACTUAL average concentration on the rooftop a few
feet away from the stack is below the effluent limit listed in the
regs. To do that, you can assume a ground level release and only the
TOTAL release over a one year period affects the outcome. If you
neglect effective stack height, the flow rate has no bearing on the
calculation. The calculations are easy enough and the NRC has no
reason to refuse granting you a request to base your effluent limits
on total activity released from the stack as opposed to
concentrations in the effluent during incinerator operation. The
former method is somewhat less concervative in terms of calculating a
dose to the hypothetical individual. On the other hand, the latter
method is WRONG. :-)
============== Original message =========
With our current stack air flow we use approximatly 50% of
our annual
effluent with the existing Part 20 values. New part 20
values
raise this to over 1200 % for the year. We are also
recalculating the stack air flow but preliminary fiqures
show only a doubling of volume.
So basically its not the ash that is the problem it is the effluent
restrictions. We are looking at having to decay over 200 40lb dogs
for
about six months if things stay as they are. This would call for a
$20,000
investment for a freezer large enough.... Hench our dilemma