[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fume Hood Decontamination
Reply-to: Hector.Mandel@p0.f15.n233.z1.fidonet.org (Hector Mandel)
Fido-To: romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu!cc.colorado.ed
In a msg on <Feb 06 18:05>, romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu!cc.colorado.ed of 1:233/13 writes:
r> Our faculty (in an unprecidented move towards common sense
r> radioactives management) are consolidating all the tracers and
r> sealed source labs in Biology and Chemistry into one room.
This could be a BIG mistake unless they also make sure and appoint ONE PERSON
to be *in charge* of the whole lab with the authority to deny access to any
faculty member that messes the place up. If they think they can have a single
lab for everyone to share without such an arrangement, you're going to have
some real problems on your hands.
r> We have five faculty in Bio and Chem who use radiation, and
r> only four of those use tracers. (This to answer the 'my god
r> they'll be running all over each other' questions....)
The fact that there are only four of them might help :-)
r> In the process, the biochemists are leaving hoods and hot
r> zones that have been used lightly.
You're not surprised are you? *grin*
r> Also, are there surfactants that are better at isotope
r> removal than, say, alconox?
There is no cleaning agent that is better at cleaning a radioactive chemical
than a non-radioactive one. Radiactivity has no effect on solubility.
--- msgedsq 2.1a
--- eecp 1.45 LM2
* Origin: Cloud Chamber BBS, LurkNET HUB 217-684-2081 (1:233/15)
--
HPS - via FidoNet node 1:233/13 (ehsnet.fidonet.org)