[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANSI N42.17a
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: ANSI N42.17a
- From: FRAMEP@ORAU.GOV
- Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 09:36:00 -0700
- Importance: normal
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US* *ESNET;c\ccmailgw\940519093741a
- P1-Recipient: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Priority: normal
- Ua-Content-Id: Re: ANSI N42.17a
- X400-Trace: US* *ESNET; arrival 940519093600-0700 action Relayed
Message authorized by:
/S=ljb1@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu/O=ORAUSMTP/PRMD=ESNET/ADMD= /C=US/ at X400PO
On May 18, 1994 Lorna Bullerwell wrote:
> A while back, someone listed a group of references for
> calibrating survey meters. One of those referenced was
> ANSI N42.17a, "Performance Specs for H.P.
> Instrumentation-Portable Instrumentation for Use in
> Normal Env. Conditions". I was wondering if someone could
> summarize what type of information is in this reference,
> so I can determine if I should purchase it or not.
> Thanks in advance for the info.
Hi Lorna, that someone was me. The reference was ANSI
N42.17A-1989 "Performance Specifications for Health Physics
Instrumentation-Portable Instrumentation for Use in Normal
Environmental Conditions" Strictly speaking, it does not
directly address the issue of calibration, and to my
knowledge, its guidance has not been "required" or even
referenced by DOE, the NRC or the NVLAP and HPS survey
instrument calibration certification programs. Hopefully,
someone will jump on me if I'm wrong about that. I've been
told the instrument manufacturers are concerned about its
possible implementation. Apparently Battelle will do
everything in N42.17A on an instrument of your choice for a
mere $20,000 or so :-). The reason I recommended obtaining
it was that it is very informative about survey instrument
performance. Far more info than in 323. For example, it
talks about moisture protection, thresholds for alarms,
markings, zero sets, check cicuits, response time, line
noise, probe surface sensitivity, extracameral response,
overload, vibration, humidity as well as the usual stuff
about energy dependence etc. It also gives info about
acceptable methods to test these parameters.
Regards, Paul W. Frame framep@orau.gov
Oak Ridge Associated Universities
"Happy are the HPs with only one instrument for they are
never in doubt"
******************************** DISCLAIMER ********************************
* *
* The comments and views expressed in this communication are strictly my *
* own and are not to be construed to officially represent those of my *
* peers, supervisors, or Cornell University. *
* *
****************************************************************************