Re: Re[2]- Re[2]- Certificat

["Jack Kay" <jgkay@coasmail.physics.drexel.edu>]

        Reply to:   RE>Re[2]: Re[2]- Certification
I agree.  I did misread your earlier proposal.  Sorry.

--------------------------------------
Date: 6/30/94 4:39 PM
To: Jack Kay
From: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Received: by coasmail.drexel.edu with SMTP;30 Jun 1994 16:39:15 -0500
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu by vixen.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA02199
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <jgkay@coasmail.physics.drexel.edu>); Thu, 30 Jun 1994
15:33:52 -0500
Received: by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
	id AA18962; Thu, 30 Jun 94 15:33:12 -0500
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 94 15:33:12 -0500
Message-Id: <9405307730.AA773008208@ccmail.orst.edu>
Errors-To: mandel@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: forrere@ccmail.orst.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]- Certification of 
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:  Radiation Safety Distribution List 


          I think you are misinturpeting my test proposal.  A reduced
          pressure test exposes the container to a reduced external
          pressure while keeping the internal pressure at atmospheric
          (if the container is going to pass anyway).  If you reverse
          the setup and leave the outside of the container atmospheric
          and increase the internal pressure you would have the same
          forces acting on the drum as in the first scenario.  If you
          used a small automobile tire stem you could use it to
          pressurize the container and use it to check for any
          pressure drop.

          Gene Forrer