[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Mammography Doses
In regards to a pre-employment "screening" to see whether or
not a condition occurs, in Oregon such a practice is
strictly FORBIDDEN!! I do not know what the regulations in
other states are but I would have a hunch that "screening"
is also illegal elsewhere. Now if an employer were to have
you take the TB skin test and you got a positive reaction
then there would be a medically indicated reason for a chest
x-ray. As far as the handling of men versus women in x-ray
safety, my experience as a state inspector has been that,
with the exception of mammography, men are more likely to
have gonadal shielding used than women, even on follow-up
films. The big reason is that the way men are put together
make it easier to shield there gonads without obscuring any
part of the useful film. Woman unfortunately have there
gonads located in the middle of the area of interest.
As to exposures received, most RT's should have a rough idea
of what patients get, most should but unfortunately most do
not. Using my state reg book "Average Patient Exposure
Guide" the following is an approximation of the
entrance skin exposures you would receive for various
projections with a 400 speed system.
Abdomen-300 mR
Lumbar Spine-350 mR
Mammography-345 mR/no grid-690 mR/grid
Full Spine-145
Cervical Spine-95 mR
Skull-70 mR
Chest-15 mR
By comparison an average dental bitewing will give you an
ESE of about 150 mR, and a dental panoramic x-ray will
result in an ESE of about 2000 mR.
Gene Forrer