[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Patient Dose Rates
Thanks for your support Joel...mike coogen
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re:: Patient Dose Rates
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at hq2ccgw
Date: 7/10/95 12:34 PM
I concur with Michael Coogen, I have measured "many"
persons receiving a "variety" of isotopes for a "plethora" of
reasons (I should have been able to get "Cornucopia" in there
somewhere!).
I have found that you are better off measuring the actual
dose rate from each person on an individual person by person
basis. There are so MANY variables (patient uptake variations,
body mass of the patient etc., etc.) that this, IMHO, is the only
fail-safe way to be sure of surrounding dose rates.
Post Scriptum, remember to check all sides of your patient,
as the dose-rate will be different in different directions
depending on which organ(s) the uptake has occurred in.
Joel Baumbaugh (Baumbaug@nosc.mil_
NRaD
San Diego, CA
STD DISCLAIMER: The Fed. Govt., Navy, does not necessary
agree with me on the above discussion.
________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Patient Dose Rates
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at hq2ccgw
Date: 7/7/95 10:09 AM
I have been asked to calculate the external (gamma) dose
rate from
patients following a wide variety of nuclear medicine
procedures.
While there is a large amount of data, and methodology, to
calculate
organ and/or patient doses, I cannot find much data about
the dose
rate from them that others might be exposed to. (There is
some limited
data in NCRP 37, but it considers everything as a point
source and
neglects attenuation within the patient's body.)
Has anyone done actual dose rate measurements on patients
after
nuclear medicine procedures? Is this data readily available
anywhere?
****************************************************
* *
* Steven D. Rima, CHP *
* Vice President, ES&H *
* RI-TECH, Inc. *
* sdrima@sandia.gov *
* *
* "Standard disclaimer stuff..." *
****************************************************