[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mixed Waste
Oh knowledgeable ones,
A colleague of mine employed by the Department of the Navy
has a problem, and perhaps this group can be of help.
This person has discovered and removed (from the ground)
some old "slag" which contains radioactive material (radium-225
and "perhaps" U-238 and thorium isotopes) AND some heavy metals
(lead, tin, copper, magnesium, beryllium etc).
This material is, of course, mixed waste.
The Problem:
The Navy is telling this command that they have 90 days to
ship this material to a disposal/treatment site or they will be
in violation of various and sundry California and Federal
regulations.
BUT:
IS THIS MATERIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE?
DOES THIS MATERIAL HAVE TO BE DISPOSED OF/SHIPPED OFF WITHIN
90 DAYS?, and
WHAT SITES CAN ACCEPT THIS WASTE (FROM CALIFORNIA)
To digress:
What is a solid waste? 40 CFR 261.2 defines a solid waste
as any discarded material that is not excluded by 261.4(a)...
40 CFR 261.4 (Exclusions): Excludes (a) Materials which
are
not solid wastes. Subsection (4) exempts a "source, special
nuclear or byproduct material" (California Title 22 66261.4
(a)(2) gives the same exemption).
So:
As this material does not meet the definition of a RCRA
SOLID WASTE, nor of a RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE, - and - it's
RADIOACTIVE, that component should take precedence over the
metals that it contains.
Therefore, the 40 CFR 262.34 "Accumulation Time" specifying
that a generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90
days or less without a permit or without having interim
status..... should not and does not apply.
What do you think, inquiring minds want to know...
Thank you all (a head of time) for your input,
Joel Baumbaugh (baumbaug@nosc.mil)
NRaD
San Diego, CA
Std. Disclaimer. The thoughts and opinions above are mine and
mine alone and do not (necessarily) reflect the opinions of the
Federal Govt., the Navy or my supervisors.