[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linear Hypothesis
It seems to me that current efforts by some to debunk the use of the linear
assumption, with a view to change public policy, are highly unlikely to succeed.
A better approach is suggested in the October 1995 HP Society Newsletter
editorial by Steven Garry, CHP, entitled "The Cost-Effectiveness of
Environmental Regulations Questioned". The point is made that, for example,
the average Consumper Product Safety Commission rule costs $68,00 per
life-year saved, while radionuclide emission control at nuclear power plants
costs about _$100 million_ per life-year saved. The last figure, I assume,
is calculated by using the linear assumption (i.e., theoretical lives lost).
I would suggest that those interested in this topic read Steven's editorial.
D. Lee Beidelman (beidelma@tis.inel.gov)
Standard Disclaimer: these are my personal opinions only.