[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dose received from air travel?
- To: SMTP PMDFADDR <MAILGATE@ADDRMELON.CA.BOEING.COM>
- Subject: Re: Dose received from air travel?
- From: Bruce Pickett <SHEA136@KGV2.bems.boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1995 15:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 0
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta MELON; Relayed; Thu, 02 Nov 1995 15:04:39 -0700
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 15:14:40 -0800
- Resent-From: SHEA136@KGV2.bems.boeing.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <9511022321.AA24791@atc.boeing.com>
- Resent-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Ua-Content-Id: Re: Dose received from air travel?
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;MRP$2NOV199515010139]
One generic number cannot necessarily be used as a representative dose rate.
Dose rates to people in aircraft at altitude are highly dependent on altitude,
latitude, and sun spot cycle.
The FAA's Advisory Circular #120-52, "Radiation Exposure of Air Carrier
Crewmembers," dated March 5, 1990 says:
"At an altitude of 35,000 feet, for example, the dose equivalent rate from
cosmic rays isabout 6 microsieverts (0.6 millirem) per hour."
AC 120-52 was revised in January 1992 as DOT/FAA/AM-92/2, "Radiation Exposure
of Air Carrier Crewmembers II." Table 1 of that document lists:
-------------------------------------------
Location Altitude, ft uSv/hr
-------------------------------------------
Oklahoma City 1,200 0.04
" " 39,000 8
Polar Region " 9
Equator " 4-5
-------------------------------------------
Bruce Pickett
The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA
shea136@kgv2.bems.boeing.com
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|"You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometime,|
| you just might find, you get what you need" - Rolling Stones|
+-------------------------------------------------------------+