[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tritium Dose Conversion Factor Confusion
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: Tritium Dose Conversion Factor Confusion
- From: "Scott O. Schwahn" <schwahn@CEBAF.GOV>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 17:22:07 -0500 (EST)
- Date-Warning: Date header was inserted by CEBAF.GOV
At 03:55 PM 1/16/96 -0600, Mr. Presley wrote:
> I am pondering the numbers used for Dose Conversion Factors for
> airborne exposure to Tritiated Water.
>
> ICRP-30 Part 1 pg 65 states that it includes allowance for
> the absorption through skin.
> Using the numbers quoted there I "backcalculate" a DCF
> of about 6.2 E-5 rem/uCi
>
> However, in ICRP 68 pg 75
> The corresponding number for tritiated water is
> 1.8E-11 Sv/Bq or about 6.6 E-5 rem/uCi.
> But this table states that skin absorption is NOT accounted for.
>
> Can anyone clear this up for me ?
> I would expect the ICRP 68 value to be about 40%
> smaller if skin absorption has not been included.
The recommendations of DOE/EH-0071 (Internal Dose Rate Conversion Factors
for Calculation of Dose to the Public), taken from ICRP Publications 26,30,
and 48 indicates a conversion factor 6.3E-05 rem/uCi uptake, either from
ingestion or inhalation.
DOE/EH-0070, External Dose-Rate Conversion Factors for Calculation of Dose
to the Public, have factors based on Oak Ridge National Laboratory
methodology, but use weighting factors based on ICRP recommendations. This
report indicates a 0.0 conversion for -external- exposure (immersion in)
contaminated air, contaminated water, or exposure from a ground surface.
Hope this helps, although it doesn't answer your question directly.
Scott O. Schwahn, CHP
Operational Health Physicist
Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility
(804)249-7551 (w)
(804)249-7363 (fax)