[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is radon as dangerous as the EPA says?

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: Is radon as dangerous as the EPA says?
From: Bernard L Cohen <blc+@pitt.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 12:59:35 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9601191230.AA35101@admin-one.radbio.mcw.edu>

My study effectively uses close to 1 million lung cancer deaths and 20 
million controls, namely 90% of those who died in U.S. over a ten year 
period. That is why statistics are not a problem. If you don't consider 
it to be a valid test of linear-nothreshold theory, please tell me why, 
or send a letter-to-the-editor of Health Physics explaining why.

Bernard L. Cohen
Physics Dept.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Tel: (412)624-9245
Fax: (412)624-9163
e-mail: blc+@pitt.edu

References:
- Re: Is radon as dangerous as the EPA says?
  - From: "John Moulder" <jmoulder@post.its.mcw.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: PuBe Neutron Spectrum Question
Next by Date: Administratium AKA ??
Prev by thread: Re: Is radon as dangerous as the EPA says?
Next by thread: Estonia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread