[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[3]: Food Irradiation
Re[3] Food Irradiation
Last I heard, the federal agency involved with the Food Irradiation
issue was FDA, not EPA. Similar comment applies, however! Another
commenter hit the key issue - the technology involved is more
accurately a process than a "food additive." Would there be as much
public resistance if it were more generally known that irradiation is
used to sterilize many types of disposable medical & surgical
supplies, first aid products, etc?
The Great Lakes Chapter, HPS sponsored a Symposium on food & other
product irradiation several years ago that got some favorable local
press coverage. Perhaps it's time for another HPS chapter to take up
the issue in this type format.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: Food Irradiation
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at guardian
Date: 2/21/96 3:38 PM
If you know what the EPA means, heaven help us!
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Food Irradiation
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet
Date: 2/21/96 12:17 PM
I would pick none of the apples until someone the EPA defines
radiation and irridation. I know what they mean....
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Food Irradiation
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at ~GW1
Date: 2/21/96 10:57 AM
To: RADSAFE --INTERNET radsafe@romulus.eh
*** Reply to note of 02/20/96 16:39
Well IF I didn't know better I would pick the apple that said treated by
Irradiation. The other one has radiation in it.
Radiation Protection, Ministry of Health, British Columbia
The opinions and material above are solely those of the author.
Disclaimer for postings to bulletin boards, newsgroups, etc.
rnross@bcsc02.gov.bc.ca