[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Other "Healthy Worker" Effect Reasons
- To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu> (Return requested) (Receipt notification requested)
- Subject: Other "Healthy Worker" Effect Reasons
- From: "Steven D Rima" <SDRIMA@sandia.gov>
- Date: 21 Mar 1996 11:47:27 -0700
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: "Steven D Rima" <SDRIMA@sandia.gov>
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [/c=US/admd=/prmd=USDOE/; 0621F3151A43F004-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: SDRIMA@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd=/prmd=USDOE/; converted ( IA5-Text); Relayed; 21 Mar 1996 11:47:27 -0700
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd=/prmd=USDOE/; converted ( IA5-Text); Relayed; 21 Mar 1996 11:47:27 -0700
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Many years ago, I recall reading a lengthy article in Nuclear News
magazine on this topic. They put forth several possible reasons for
the "healthy worker effect" that I have not seen mentioned on Radsafe.
The nuclear industry is, on the whole, much better educated, younger,
and better paid than the general public, and in fact better than most
other occupations that deal with potential hazardous substances. This
makes it very hard to find a suitable 'non-nuclear' comparison group
for health studies. A group that is better educated, younger, and more
affluent tends to:
1. Have a better diet and generally healthier lifestyle, which can
certainly affect some cancer rates.
2. Have better medical care, the affects of which are obvious.
3. Have a lower percentage of smokers, affecting several cancer rates.
A number of other factors were given that affect the overall health
condition of nuclear workers compared to other groups, but as I recall
they were not related to cancer induction, but rather other health
concerns.
Steven D. Rima, CHP
sdrima@sandia.gov