[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Part 2 Application -Reply



Although not a technician myself, I take offense to your
implication regarding who performs "real" health physics
work.  The technicians that I work with perform a great deal
of invaluable "real" health physics work.  I am sure there are
much better descriptions of the difference between what
professional level HP's perform (mostly in their office) and
what technicians perform ( representing the health physics
organization in the field).  If the original sender of the thread
would like to contact a technician/CHP (Part I/II the first
time) for advise on his submission I would be happy to
provide a contact.

my opinion only
cbrown@envc.sandia.gov

>>> Wesley M. Dunn  <WDUNN@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us>
03/29/96 02:31pm >>>
Dave,

I believe that they will accept any serious technical report
that demonstrates real health physics (not technician)
quality of work.
Quite frankly, I suspect they don't put too much weight on
this document any more (if ever), due to the enormous
number of applicants.

Wes

> Date:          Fri, 29 Mar 96 15:04:07 -0600
> Reply-to:      radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From:          Dave <dama@waterw.com>
> To:            Multiple recipients of list
<radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject:       Part 2 Application

> I am preparing an application for Part 2 of the ABHP exam
and have a
> question concerning the submission of a work that is the
creation of the
> applicant.  I am heavily involved in procedure research and
preparation but
> I understand that submission of procedures will not be
accepted because they
> are considered "cut and dry" based on 10CFR20
requirements.  I do not want
> to submit an application and have it kicked back at the
last minute because
> the submission is unsatisfactory.
>
> I also research and prepare various technical bases
documents to support
> such things as hot particle action limits, free release
criteria, air
> sampling protocols, etc.  Are these types of documents
considered acceptable
> for the exam application?
>
>
*********************************************************************
Wesley M. Dunn, C.H.P.                     512-834-6688
Deputy Director, Licensing                 512-834-6690 (fax)
(Texas) Bureau of Radiation Control       
wdunn@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us
*********************************************************************