Re[4]: Multi-clinic Monitoring

[RONALD GOODWIN <RONALD_GOODWIN@health.ohio.gov>]

     Agreement state or not, NRC still does not regulate radiation 
     generating equipment, the state usually has a program for that. If I 
     am wrong, well, I am an old power plant hp.  What do I know about 
     X-ray tubes?  I am just writing the rules for Ohio to become an 
     Agreement State, can't be right all the time, eh?  <Exceedingly large 
     GRIN!>
     
     Ronald_goodwin@health.ohio.gov


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Multi-clinic Monitoring
Author:  radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet
Date:    4/5/96 9:58 AM


Regulators, check me if if wrong, but if this is a non-agreement state, OSHA, 
not NRC regulates the exposure. OSHA is still committed to the old 10 CFR 20. 
Limit is 1250 per quarter, or 3000 if badged.  THere hasn't been an over 
exposure in the fourth quarter. Can't tell where he got the 4000 in the 
previous months but there may or may not be a problem there. 
BTW, OSHA does look at these things sometimes.  We were constructing a  tunnele 
in Boston that
I had to go check radon levels in, when another tunnel under construction, 
d
by another organization was cited for not monitoring for radon in the tunnel. e 
Yes there was a potential problem, 70+ pCi/liter.
     
Luke McCormick c0etxlim@mrd42.mrd.usace.army.mil
     
> 
>      However, if the hospital is not using NRC licensed sources, and 
>      therefore are not a licensee then this reference does not apply to 
>      them.
>      
>      The NRC does not regulate radiation producing equipment. 
>      
>      Ronald_goodwin@health.ohio.gov 
> 
> 
> ______________________________ Reply Separator 
_________________________________
> Subject: re:Multi-clinic Monitoring
> Author:  radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet 
> Date:    4/4/96 2:06 PM
> 
> 
> The response to Question 216 in NUREG/CR-6204 "Questions and Answers Based on 
> Revised 10 CFR Part 20" touches on the issue of dose monitoring for medical 
> personnel who work at several facilities simultaneously. It indicates that  
> Appendix X to Regulatory Guide 10.8, Rev. 2 was developed to provide guidance 
> for the implementation of the revised Part 20 at a medical facility. The 
> response also says that this guide will be revised in its entirety in the 
> future to address the changes in 10 CFR Part 20.
>      
> I don't know whether or not this revision has been completed. 
>      
> Ben Morgan
>      
> ben.morgan@cplc.com
>      
> My employee has neither reviewed nor approved this message. 
>