Re: Design of Nuclear Power Plants

["Wesley M. Dunn" <WDUNN@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us>]

Just one slight disagreement:

I feel that any adequately trained Nuclear Engineer would have
recognized the danger and shut down the operation long before the
system became unsafe.  A review of the "minutes" (the operator's
chronology) of the accident shows that the tests could not be
performed without leaving the reactor in a dangerously unstable
situation.  Instead of stopping, they continued to override the
safety systems.

Wes


> Date:          Wed, 1 May 96 11:22:46 -0500
> Reply-to:      radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From:          "Cuttler, Jerry" <CuttlerJ@spkb.candu.aecl.ca>
> To:            Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject:       Re: Design of Nuclear Power Plants

>  The operating procedures did not forbid such operation.
>  Had this mode of operation been analyzed in advanced, this weakness would
> have been identified.  Hindsight is 20/20.
>
> Jerry Cuttler
> Canadian Nuclear Society

*********************************************************************
Wesley M. Dunn, C.H.P.                     512-834-6688
Deputy Director, Licensing                 512-834-6690 (fax)
(Texas) Bureau of Radiation Control        wdunn@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us
*********************************************************************