[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Air Crew Rad Workers
While it is a fact that some crews might be exposed to enough
radiation exposure over a year due to a lot of flight time, there is
no justification to require monitoring the individual. There is no
Licensee which rules out the NRC. Other than restricting flight time
there is no reasonable method to reduce their time in flight, which is
already reduced by FAA requirements for other reasons. You're NOT
going to shield the plane and they're not going to wear protective
shielding either. As far as monitoring, if it were required, who is
going to be responsible for maintaining the dosimetry records? Who is
going to regulate it (as stated, there are many jurisdictions that are
involved). I for one would hope that the FAA act upon the many
recommendations they already have on their plate, and implement them,
such as upgraded flight air traffic control computer systems that
provide a better reliability factor, better and more frequent
inspections of the equipment that is in the air where these
individuals are exposed, installed wind shear equipment, more frequent
flight simulator training, implement the same safety requirements for
all aircraft that fly passengers, be they foreign or smaller US
airlines. In my opinion these are examples where the health and safety
of the crew, as well as the flying public, would be better served than
trying to maintain records of exposure, that we all agree is "most
likely" lower than monitoring required for radiation workers who are
exposed from activities that are "licensed", which flight crew
exposure is not.
Sandy Perle
Supervisor Health Physics
Florida Power and Light Company
(407) 694-4219 office
(407) 694-3706 fax
e-mail sandy_perle@email.fpl.com
The opinions expressed are solely mine
homepage: http://www.wp.com/54398/home.html