[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
H3 on Subs
To those unfamiliar, Naval reactor plants are very tight; near zero
leakage primary coolant systems. As a result, there is very little
exposure to primary coolant at all, with one exception.
The duty "ELT" draws primary coolant samples daily, and purges a
decent volume of coolant when getting a depressurized sample. This
poses a potential risk for tritium exposure. Several factors come in
to play to mitigate the risk.
As I remember, on S5W boats, there was a ventilation supply duct that
practically blew on my face while drawing the samples. I don't know if
this was an accident in design, probably not. The ELT also wears a
faceshield, rubber gloves, a rubber apron, and plastic arm-sleeves
when drawing the samples. All purged coolant was hard-piped directly
to sealed retention tanks that were isolated when draing was not
actively in-progress.
As far as tritium vapor, the engineering spaces on a sub are quite
humid, with several "spot coolers" that are fed with chilled water in
cooling coils. From a real-life tritium excursion we experienced while
I was staff at a prototype, I know that the spot coolers are HIGHLY
efficient at removing tritiated water vapor in the air.
The condensation from the coolers went to the bilges. The bilges are
frequently pumped overboard, and usually had some amount of oil on the
surface, which acts to minimize evaporation.
In short, I don't know what the tritium levels were in the coolant,
but (unscientifically) it looks like the risks of exposure were quite
low. On the surface, Navy RadCon and RadChem looks quite simplistic,
but few realize the amount of work that went into the development of
the program. After 4 yrs in commercial power reactors, I appreciate
the value of a non-nonsense, no bells and whistles, back to basics
approach to field RadCon.
Disclaimer: my opinions are mine and mine only.
P.S. Does anyone remember the original issue?
Best wishes;
H.Anagnostopoulos
DREHA@ccmail.ceco.com