[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newspaper Story About Soviet Pu Workers in 40's and 50's
>Dear Colleagues:
> What seems relatively newsworthy in this story is the health endpoint,
>"pneumoscleriosis". In my scant contacts with Russian radiological
>health personnel, they seem to have documented a substantial amount of
>hot particle inhalation and to have more pulmonary fibrosis among those
>exposed. I assume these are related. In our preoccupation with cancer, I
>don't recall many reports of pulmonary fibrosis. I looked for such reports
>for uranium miners but failed to find them.
>Can some of you radsafers fill us in on this?
> John Goldsmith, M.D., M.P.H., Ben Gurion U. gjohn@bgumail.bgu.ac.il
>On Thu, 6 Jun 1996, Dr. Marvin Goldman wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Fellow Radsafers,
>> >
>> > I have just come across a May 25 newspaper clipping
>> > in the Ottawa Citizen discussing the story
>> > of Soviet weapons facility workers in the
>> > late 40's and early 50's.
>> >
>> > The article says that there were very poor
>> > working conditions at the plant at Dubna
>> > and that a number of workers died of an
>> > apparently Pu-induced pneumo-sclerosis.
>> >
>> > I apologize if this is old news to you
>> > but I would like to know if there is more
>> > information out there on this topic.
>> >
>> > Jim Presley
>> > Health Physicist
>> > AECB
>> >
>> > presley.j@atomcom.gc.ca
>> I would check the news paper source. Dubna was not into Pu heavily.
>>
>> However, a part of Mayak PA, the radiochemical plant at Ozorsk
>> (Chelyabinsk-65), from '48-'58 did experience major regional, population
>> exposures as well as the highest ever recorded worker Pu exposures,
>> resulting in chronic radiation sickness, increased leukenmia and lung
>> cancer risk and major liver burdens as well.
>>
>> These are continuing to be studied and is the subject of a major bi-lateral
>> research program between USA and Russia; some of the early information
>> will be in the July '96 issue of the Health Physics Journal. The
>> collective dose from all operations and accidents there is likely to be
>> larger than that for Hiroshima and Nagasaki (and the folloup time is
>> roughly comparable. We may have the potential for an independent
>> assessment of human radiation risks from non-acute exposures if the
>> resources are available to do the work).
>>
>> Additional Pu risks may have been experienced at Tomsk-7 and at
>> Krasnyarsk-26, but little has been published about these places.
>>
>> Marvin Goldman
>>
>>
Reply on Pneumosclerosis:
Some of the radiochemical plant workers at MAYAK, (Chelyabinsk-65), exposed
to aerosols and external radiation in the 1848-58 period, suffered from
pneumosclerosis and fibrosis from massive lung burdens of radioactive
materials. Some 7-10 died in a few years and several dozen survivors are
still being followed. Details in upcoming July issue of Health Physics
Journal