RE: -Reply

["Spell, Bill" <bills@deq.state.la.us>]

What I meant to say, if it was THAT unclear, was that the untrained (or 
lesser trained) guy was outside doing the work and getting the (in some 
cases) excessive or over-exposure.  Hopefully, this clarifies it, and Rocky 
thanks you!  By the way, after we put that requirement in, the excessive 
exposures went down, whether from the rule or better training, or less 
radiography being performed, who knows?  We just couldn't control all the 
variables.  (I'm glad someone is looking out for the truth!)

Bill Spell
bills@deq.state.la.us
 ----------
From: radsafe
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: RE: -Reply
Date: Friday, June 14, 1996 3:05PM

Bill,

To borrow Bullwinkle's phrase, "I'm so confused!"

Reading your note about radiography did you mean to say that the individual
in the dark room
was getting more exposure or the "untrained" guy/gal actually doing the
radiography was
getting the dose?   Maybe, I'm reading it the wrong way (which happens this
time of the day!)
but it appears that you are saying that the indivdual in the dark room was
getting the higher
exposure.   If so, what's it attributed to????

Inquiring minds want to know.   :)

Jim Myers
OSP/NRC

Any opines offered here are CERTAINLY NOT those of the Agency!  :)