[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: The Ethics Issue Continued
Here is a short list I have kept. MIGHT need some updating:
Sandy Perle
sandy_perle@email.fpl.com
sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
http://www.netcom.com/~sandyfl/home.html
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205
Source of Exposure Exposure
Natural Background 0.006 mR/hr
Coal Burning Power Plant 0.165 mR/yr
X-rays from TV set (1 inch) 0.500 mR/hr
Airplane ride (39,000 ft.) 0.500 mR/hr
Nuclear Power Plant (normal operation 0.600 mR/yr
at plant boundary)
Weapons Fallout < 1 mR/yr
Building materials (concrete) 3 mR/yr
Drinking Water 5 mRem/yr
Coast to coast Airplane roundtrip 5 mRem/RT
Chest x-ray 5 - 20 mRem/exp
Pocket watch (radium dial) 6 mRem/yr
Eyeglasses (containing thorium) 6 - 11 mR/yr
Natural gas in home 9 mRem/yr
Dental x-ray 10 mRem/exp
terrestrial background (Atlantic coast) 16 mRem/yr
head/neck x-ray 20 mRem/exp
Cosmic Radiation (sea level) 26 mRem/yr
Radionuclides in the body (ie potassium) 39 mRem/yr
Cosmic Radiation (Denver) 50 mRem/yr
Terrestrial background (Rocky Mountains 63 mRem/yr
Three Mile Island (dose at plant duration 80 mRem
of the accident)
Public dose limits due to licensed 100 mRem/yr
activities (NRC)
Lumbar/spinal x-rays 130 mRem/exp
Pelvis/hip x-ray 160 mRem/exp
Shoe Fitting Fluroscope (not in use now) 170 mRem/exp
Upper GI series 245 mRem/exp
Cumulative Natural Background 300 mRem/yr
Lower GI series 405 mRem/exp
Occupational Exposure Limits for Minors 500 mRem/yr
Occupational Exposure Limits for Fetus 500 mRem
Occupational Limits (TEDE) 5,000 mRem/yr
Occupational Limits (Eye) 15,000 mRem/yr
Occupational Limits (skin) 50,000 mRem/yr
Occupational Limits (extremities) 50,000 mRem/yr
Diagnostic thyroid exam 90,000 mRad/exp
Therapeutic thyroid exam 1,000,000 mRad/exp
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: The Ethics Issue Continued
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet-Mail
Date: 7/1/96 10:38 AM
By the way, a number of Radsafers have mentioned that we ought to put
radiation risks in perspective, or words to that effect. It occurred to me,
however, that very few suggestions have been offered as to how to do this
effectively. The old comparison to chest x-rays and cigarette smoking just
don't fill the bill. One or two that I read were excellent, and I hope
someone is writing these down and compiling a list of those which may be
useful to those who have to explain to the uneducated masses (in radiation
matters, of course).