[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Personnel Dosimetry Records -Reply
I understand the concern about privacy, but I work in a unique
environment. I work in a union/management environment at a nuclear
power plant. I think we probably post dose numbers in each department
so that each union worker can ensure that they are not being unfairly
treated by their management oppressors implementing the dose
equalization program. This sounds kinda silly but it is pretty much
true.
There is probably some agreement between the union and management
about privacy behind the scenes, but I'm not aware of any specifics.
It would certainly be the correct thing to have some sort of agreement
with your personnel about posting in a common work area.
All in all, I think posting exposure totals does give each person a
better feel for their exposure and results in an overall benefit for
the group. Offer a free lunch to the person with the lowest monthly
exposure? Some plants give out "ALARA bucks" which can be redeemed
for prizes for those with low exposures.
Talk with other power plant personnel who may have a better feel for
the behind-the-scenes legal stuff. I'm not sure how to say it best,
but there are definite benefits to being somewhat open about exposures
received.
Good luck,
Glen vickers
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Personnel Dosimetry Records -Reply
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at INTERNET
Date: 7/10/96 11:07 AM
Don't necessarily agree with BRZGV. True, the supervisor should know
what his/her teams' exposure is, lifetime and YTD. And the individual
should definitely know what his/her exposure is; however, comparing
exposures does little to benefit the group/individual re: radiation
exposure control. Re: collective doses, sure. This definitely comes into
play when you are deriving ALARA goals. If the individual wishes to
divulge this information, so be it. But individual exposures should not be
posted, just the collective groups.
DHARRISON@DOE.LANL.GOV
>>> <BRZGV@ccmail.ceco.com> 07/10/96 07:09am >>>
Supervisors must know how much dose their personnel are
accumulating.
How might they use "dose-equalization" principles or look at trends or
comparisons between workers to ensure that everyone is performing
work
in a manner that is consistent with ALARA principles?
I would think that the name, monthly, and yearly total posted in the
group breakroom would be reasonable. This allows workers to
compare
themselves against one another and possibly question their own
exposure.
You need to find the balance between the needs of the individual and
the needs of the group.
Glen Vickers
Nuclear Power HP
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Personnel Dosimetry Records
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at INTERNET
Date: 7/9/96 2:13 PM
Recently a question of confidentiality of personnel dosimetry records has
been brought up. The question is, if monthly film badge exposures are
posted in a department, what, if any, information on the report from the
badge vendor should not be posted? information such as SSN and DOB
are assumed not to be posted. The main question is, each person has a
participant number, so should the name also be excluded so the
exposure is theoretically known only to the participant? What right do
supervisors and managers have to know the exposures of the people
they supervise? Do occupational radiation exposure records come
under the federal Privacy Act? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Bob Yoss
Radiation Safety Coordinator
Medical College of Wisconsin/Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital 9200
W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226
Office 414-257-5381
FAX 414-259-7889