[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Answers to Electronic Dosimetry Operability Checks
Jamie
As a power reactor user of EPDs, the alarm response check is a very
important feature to me. Our operating license contains requriements
for entering high radiation areas and provides several options. One
of the options is the use of what we call the EPD (terminology has
changed over the years). The key feature is the alarming aspect of
the dosimter. I would find it as difficult to justify not checking
out the alarm function of an EPD when it is issued to the worker as I
would in not performing a source check of a survey instrument prior to
performing a survey.
Our experience has shown that there are a very small number of
failures in the alarm check when looking at the big picture. In 1995
we had actual 41 actual alarm check failures and so far in 1996 we
have had 16. We have had some pseudo-failures which involved the
worker not inserting the dosimeter in the reader properly. In putting
these in perspective, we have 1000 EPDs in service and there have been
over 250,000 uses of the EPDs this year. While the number of failures
is small when compared to the overall useage, they are real and can be
detected prior to issue.
We have been using the MG equipment since 1989 and have used both the
DMC-90 and DMC-100 model dosimeters.
My apologies for not answering your request, but I totally missed it.
If you want to discuss this further, give me a call at (561) 467-7302.
Hayden 'Doc' Mercer
FPL - St. Lucie Plant
dmercer@email.fpl.com
normal disclaimers apply - whaterver that really means.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Answers to Electronic Dosimetry Operability Checks
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet-Mail
Date: 9/24/96 07.50
About a week ago I posted a request for information about how
operability checks for electronic dosimetry are performed. Specifically I
wondered if the readers check the speaker function prior to entry. I
received two responses to my question. One was from a user who
agreed that the speaker function should be checked. The second was
from a vendor explaining that his product does not require a check
because of the high reliability.
Opinion
I felt that I made a reasonable request for information and was
disappointed at the poor response. Many RADSAFE users tend to use
this forum for 'soapbox' type postings. I believe that the free expression
of informed opinion is an important part of life in a democratic society,
however I am sorry that the majority of the RADSAFE posts are in the
opinion category.
Jamie Mallon