[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Exempt vs. Non-licensed ?
I for one appreciate people taking the time to donate their
professional (and even non-professional) opinions on this exempt Vs.
non-exempt topic. I have received various conflicting answers from
both regulators and licensees over the years regarding several
questions pertaining to this issue.
So lets see if I have it down...From the majority of the past opinions
it appears that the following statements are (or at least may be)
correct:
1. You can throw away smoke detectors as long as its in small
quantities.
2. Its not a good idea to combine large quantities of any exempt
device.
3. A licensee may transfer unlimited numbers of single exempt
quantities to unlicensed persons as long as its not for disposal or
commercial distribution
4. Once a license is issued, the terms of that license and Part 20
govern with respect to waste disposal for exempt and non-exempt
sources.
5. Exempt quantity and concentration limits cannot be used to release
contaminated material or someone with internal or external
contamination (this seems obvious).
6. You need a license to distribute exempt sources for commercial
distribution (and commercial distribution does not mean money has to
change hands, but only that the source is introduced into the
marketplace)
Now, lets bring this one step further...
Many licensees have specific requirements for inventory, storage, etc.
regarding non-exempt sources that they receive under their license. I
have been told by regulators that once you receive a source under a
license that all of the license requirements apply until the source is
transferred or disposed. Therefore, if a licensee received a
non-exempt source that eventually decayed to less than its exempt
quantity, the licensee would still have to inventory or control the
source as his license dictates.
Does anyone have a conflicting opinion on this.. especially NRC or
agreement state regulators?.. Furthermore, if a non-exempt source
(originally received under your license) decays to an activity less
than its exempt quantity limit, is it O.K. for you to transfer it to
an unlicensed person. (I would think at a minimum you better maintain
paperwork to show that it decayed below the appropriate level before
you transferred it).
Thanks in advance for your thoughts
Jay Tarzia, CHP
tarzijp@naesco.com