[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Single Channel

To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: RE: Single Channel
From: William Lorenzen <LORENZEN_W@A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 08:09:22 EST
A1-Type: MAIL
Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
Hop-Count: 0
Importance: normal
In-Reply-To: <199611070058.QAA08614@m1.sprynet.com>
Mr-Received: by mta AREEL; Relayed; Thu, 07 Nov 1996 08:11:54 -0500 (EST)
Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 08:11:00 EST
Priority: normal
Ua-Content-Id: E2637ZWOHBP6GF
X400-Mts-Identifier: [;45118070116991/4474799@HUB]

I would suggest 50 kev through 200 kev...

This will catch the predominant peaks of Thorium and Uranium 235.

William A. Lorenzen
Radiation Safety Officer
Children's Hospital
Boston, MA
lorenzen_w@a1.tch.harvard.edu

References:
- Single Channel
  - From: radcon@sprynet.com

Prev by Date: Re: CS-137 in animals
Next by Date: Radiation monitoring badges in cine/floro exams
Prev by thread: Re: Single Channel
Next by thread: Re: Single Channel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread