[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: ionization chambers, micro rem meters, etc.
- To: SMTP PMDFADDR <MAILGATE@ADDRMELON.CA.boeing.com>
- Subject: re: ionization chambers, micro rem meters, etc.
- From: "RICHARD W. EDWARDS" <SHEA132@KGV2.bems.boeing.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 0
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta MELON; Relayed; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 12:59:15 -0700
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:19:19 -0800
- Resent-From: SHEA132@KGV2.bems.boeing.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <9611140734.AA19493@atc.boeing.com>
- Resent-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Ua-Content-Id: re: ionization chambers, micro rem meters, etc.
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;MRP$13NOV199612591322]
The original post raised a question (in my mind at least):
What kind of operations involving radionuclides could result in a need to
monitor beta dose rates and would not already limit access to the area by
non-radiation workers due to contamination concerns? Maybe I spent too much
time in the nuclear power community, but I couldn't think of anything. If
there is, I would appreciate a reply.
Thanks,
Richard W. Edwards, Analyst The Boeing Company
Phone/Fax: (206)393-1999/393-3060 P.O. Box 3703, M/S 6Y-38
email: shea132@kgv2.bems.boeing.com Seattle, WA 98124-2207